Line 57: |
Line 57: |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 221px; text-align: left; background: white;" |Risk assessment | | | style="width: 221px; text-align: left; background: white;" |Risk assessment |
− | | colspan="2" style="width: 908px; text-align: left; background: white;" |Since the change of the GNSS antenna is visible visually on PCB, in order to avoid problems at the customs of certain countries, we suggest informing the relevant authorities about the change of the GNSS antenna as soon as possible. The new GNSS antenna provides an equivalent track quality and performance level, as verified through testing. | + | | colspan="2" style="width: 908px; text-align: left; background: white;" |Since the change of the GNSS antenna is visible visually on PCB, in order to avoid problems at the customs of certain countries, we suggest informing the relevant authorities about the change of the GNSS antenna as soon as possible. The new GNSS antenna provides an equivalent track quality and performance level, as verified through testing. Testing results: |
| + | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; background-color:#ffffff;" |
| + | |- style="font-weight:bold;" |
| + | ! style="color:#000000;" | Device |
| + | ! Antenna |
| + | ! Mounting conditions* |
| + | ! style="color:#000000;" | Avg. Difference<br /> from precise track** [m] |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_162 |
| + | | New |
| + | | Excellent |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 2,59 |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_745 |
| + | | Old |
| + | | style="background-color:#FFF;" | Excellent |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 4,43<br /> |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_170 |
| + | | New |
| + | | Good |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 3,45 |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_937 |
| + | | Old |
| + | | Good |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 4,68 |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_238 |
| + | | New |
| + | | Normal |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 3,93 |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_705 |
| + | | Old |
| + | | Normal |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 4,92 |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_071 |
| + | | New |
| + | | style="background-color:#FFF;" | Poor |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 4,98 |
| + | |- |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | FMT100_638 |
| + | | Old |
| + | | Poor |
| + | | style="color:#000000;" | 5,05 |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | '''*'''''Mounting conditions'' - device position under the hood <br> |
| + | '''**'''''Avg. Difference from precise track'' - measured by comparing positioning data from devices and RTK (Real-time kinematic positioning) system data which is considered precise data. The smaller avvg. difference from precise track, means better track quality. |
| + | |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="text-align: left; background: white;" |Suggested implementation plan | | | style="text-align: left; background: white;" |Suggested implementation plan |